, 2023-01-01 09:00:00,
A lawsuit in Washington state and another case before the US Supreme Court are part of a coordinated campaign that experts say is pushing once-fringe legal theories before the nation’s highest court and represents the most serious challenge to tribal sovereignty in more than 50 years.
Maverick Gaming, which operates 19 card rooms in Washington and casinos in Nevada and Colorado, is challenging a 2020 law that allows sports betting only on tribal land. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Washington state, claims the law created a “discriminatory tribal gambling monopoly.”
But it goes further, arguing that gambling compacts between Washington state and tribes are based on race and therefore unconstitutionally discriminate against people who run non-tribal casinos. The argument points to the inherent right of tribal nations to govern themselves and to centuries of US law that recognizes the political parity of tribal governments along with their state and federal counterparts.
Advocates and legal experts say the Maverick case and others like it threaten to return to the politics of the Era of Termination of the 1950s, when the US government sought to end the political status of Indian tribes forever. .
The most high-profile of the cases, argued before the US Supreme Court in November, centers on the right of Native American families to have preference over non-Native families in adoption placements for Native children.
As in the Maverick case, the plaintiffs in Brackeen v. Haaland claim the…
,
To read the original article from news.google.com, Click here
A lawsuit in Washington state and another case before the US Supreme Court are part of a coordinated campaign that experts say is pushing once-fringe legal theories before the nation’s highest court and represents the most serious challenge to tribal sovereignty in more than 50 years.
Maverick Gaming, which operates 19 card rooms in Washington and casinos in Nevada and Colorado, is challenging a 2020 law that allows sports betting only on tribal land. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Washington state, claims the law created a “discriminatory tribal gambling monopoly.”
But it goes further, arguing that gambling compacts between Washington state and tribes are based on race and therefore unconstitutionally discriminate against people who run non-tribal casinos. The argument points to the inherent right of tribal nations to govern themselves and to centuries of US law that recognizes the political parity of tribal governments along with their state and federal counterparts.
Advocates and legal experts say the Maverick case and others like it threaten to return to the politics of the Era of Termination of the 1950s, when the US government sought to end the political status of Indian tribes forever. .
The most high-profile of the cases, argued before the US Supreme Court in November, centers on the right of Native American families to have preference over non-Native families in adoption placements for Native children.
As in the Maverick case, the plaintiffs in Brackeen v. Haaland claim the…
[ad_1]
, 2023-01-01 09:00:00,
A lawsuit in Washington state and another case before the US Supreme Court are part of a coordinated campaign that experts say is pushing once-fringe legal theories before the nation’s highest court and represents the most serious challenge to tribal sovereignty in more than 50 years.
Maverick Gaming, which operates 19 card rooms in Washington and casinos in Nevada and Colorado, is challenging a 2020 law that allows sports betting only on tribal land. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Washington state, claims the law created a “discriminatory tribal gambling monopoly.”
But it goes further, arguing that gambling compacts between Washington state and tribes are based on race and therefore unconstitutionally discriminate against people who run non-tribal casinos. The argument points to the inherent right of tribal nations to govern themselves and to centuries of US law that recognizes the political parity of tribal governments along with their state and federal counterparts.
Advocates and legal experts say the Maverick case and others like it threaten to return to the politics of the Era of Termination of the 1950s, when the US government sought to end the political status of Indian tribes forever. .
The most high-profile of the cases, argued before the US Supreme Court in November, centers on the right of Native American families to have preference over non-Native families in adoption placements for Native children.
As in the Maverick case, the plaintiffs in Brackeen v. Haaland claim the…
,
To read the original article from news.google.com, Click here
Private Internet Access gives you unparalleled access to thousands
of next-gen servers in over 83 countries and each US state. Your
VPN experience will always be fast, smooth, and reliable.
